‘Boom and bust’ cycle of deep-sea trawling unsustainable, study finds

first_imgAnimals, Biodiversity, Conservation, Environment, Green, Marine, Marine Animals, Marine Biodiversity, Marine Conservation, Marine Ecosystems, Oceans, Research, Wildlife Article published by Shreya Dasgupta Researchers have built a global picture of deep-sea fish catches from bottom trawling from 1950 to 2015.Deep-sea trawling can be extremely destructive for fish populations, while providing minimal economic benefits, the study found.Researchers also found that large quantities of fish caught in the deep sea go unreported. Fishing in the remote waters of the deep sea isn’t easy. But with technological advancements, fishing boats have pushed farther and deeper into the oceans, frequently using bottom trawl gear — giant fishing nets weighted down with metal attachments that drag along the seafloor — to scoop up huge amounts of fish from depths of up to 2,000 meters (6,560 feet).Deep-sea trawling, however, can be extremely destructive for fish populations, while providing minimal economic benefits, researchers have found. Catches from deep-sea trawling are also grossly underreported, the researchers conclude in a new study published in Frontiers in Marine Science.“Considering that the search for fishable resources, though partly ‘buffered’ by some recent regulatory positions … is progressively moving deeper and deeper, the picture that emerges from this study is definitely worrying,” Antonio Pusceddu, professor of ecology at the University of Cagliari, Italy, who was not involved in the study, told Mongabay.Pacific sleeper shark. Image by NOAA.Bottom-trawling in the deep sea likely unsustainableBetween 1950 and 2015, bottom trawls caught about 25 million tons of 72 fish species at depths greater than 400 meters (1,310 feet), the researchers found. Many of these fisheries followed a “boom and bust” pattern, with fish harvests first thriving, then quickly crashing.This shows that deep-sea bottom-trawled fisheries are not sustainable, lead author Lissette Victorero, a doctoral student at the National Oceanography Centre, U.K., told Mongabay. “Most of them last only a decade or two. Additionally, this cycle is so rapid that the management and the scientific knowledge about the [target] species is lagging. Hence, the fishery is inappropriately regulated and the stock becomes rapidly over-exploited leading to a collapse,” she said.Past research has shown that in the deep sea, fish and other organisms tend to live longer, and grow and reproduce more slowly. This suggests that fisheries could rapidly and indiscriminately overexploit deep-sea species, the researchers say, without giving them sufficient time to bounce back.However, the overall catch from deep-sea bottom-trawled fisheries over the 65-year study period contributed to less than 0.5 percent of global fisheries.“Certain deep-sea fisheries, such as the orange roughy [Hoplostethus atlanticus] in New Zealand, are highly valuable for a very small number of companies, in this case maybe two or three,” said co-author Les Watling, professor of biology at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. “But the environmental damage is extensive so we have to wonder whether those few companies should be allowed to benefit when the damage is so severe.”Orange roughy caught in a trawl from off New Zealand. Image by Claire Nouvian/Bloom Association.Deep-sea fish catch data hugely underreportedWhat is particularly alarming, the researchers say, is that large quantities of fish caught in the deep portions of the ocean go unreported.To arrive at their final estimates, the researchers combined information from two sources: marine fish landings officially reported by countries to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) from 1950 to 2015, and a set of estimates for unreported, bycatch and discarded catch data reconstructed by the Sea Around Us project, a research initiative at the University of British Columbia.The study found that the FAO database, which includes only what countries report to the organization, underreported deep-sea, bottom-trawled catch data by about 43 percent. The total fish catch for the study period, according to the FAO database, was 14 million tons. But when combined with the Sea Around Us dataset, the researchers arrived at an estimate of 25 million tons.One reason for this underreporting, Victorero said, is that trawlers end up catching everything in their way, including immature individuals that do not meet the desirable size requirements, or species that have no commercial value. But countries may be reporting only what was kept and landed at the dock, and not what was discarded. In fact, Victorero’s team estimated that deep-sea fisheries discarded some 6 million tons of fish during the study period.The official landings reported to the FAO also do not account for commercially valuable fish that may have been illegally caught outside of existing official quotas, Victorero said.Furthermore, during the earlier days of deep-sea fisheries, the FAO did not require the reporting of many deep-sea species. Without any set quotas, whenever new fisheries were found, there would be a “gold rush” for resources, Victorero said, particularly around seamounts and ridges where many deep-sea fish aggregate to feed and spawn.Imants G. Priede, professor emeritus at the University of Aberdeen, U.K., who was not part of the study, agreed that the underreporting of official data was alarming. “The study clearly shows that the industry has been based on successively depleting one resource after another leaving behind a barren sea floor which may take decades or centuries to recover,” he said.Summit of a seamount in the northwest Atlantic that has been fished with a bottom trawl. Image by NOAA/IFE/URI.Accuracy of fish catch datasetsThe study, however, cautions that even the Sea Around Us datasets might contain uncertainties, which may affect final estimates of unreported fish catch. “The method of estimating [unreported catches] can vary from country to country, so it is possible that the accuracy of the estimates will also vary according to country,” the researchers write in the paper.Divya Karnad, founder of InSeason Fish, an India-based sustainable seafood program, and consultant with the Bay of Bengal Intergovernmental Organization, FAO, illustrated some of the uncertainties using India as an example.The Sea Around Us project’s estimate for unreported catch from India’s small-scale fisheries is based on several assumptions and extrapolations, Karnad said, which is “not the same as having rigorously collected scientific data that allows us to quantify catch from a fishery.”Karnad, who was not involved in the study, added that while the list of deep-sea, bottom-trawled fish species compiled in the study is an important one, it seemed biased toward temperate and polar regions. “Tropical deep water species, such as Bramble sharks, which are landed from India’s deep water fisheries, [are] missing from the list,” she said.Despite the limitations, the researchers write that the FAO data combined with the Sea Around Us reconstructions constitute “the only data compilation available for estimating reported and unreported landings and discards for deep-sea fisheries.”Citation:Victorero, L. et al. (2018). Out of Sight, But Within Reach: A Global History of Bottom-Trawled Deep-Sea Fisheries From >400 m Depth. Frontiers in Marine Science. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00098center_img Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredlast_img